The Curtsy That Speaks Volumes: Why Diana and Kate Embody Royalty — While Camilla Falls Flat
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps

In royal tradition, few gestures are as symbolic as the curtsy. A graceful dip of the knees, a gentle tilt of the head — it's a show of respect, elegance, and quiet strength. But not all curtsies are created equal. And in the world of royalty, how you curtsy can say more than what you wear or say.
While Princess Diana and Princess Kate have long been praised for their impeccable form, poise, and confidence in this centuries-old gesture, Camilla’s curtsy has often drawn uncomfortable reactions — and for good reason.
Diana: The Definition of Poise
From her earliest years as Princess of Wales, Diana understood the power of body language. Her curtsy wasn’t just about etiquette — it was about grace under pressure. Whether meeting heads of state or members of foreign royalty, Diana moved with natural fluidity and confidence.
A shining example came in 1987 during her royal visit to Spain. While meeting Queen Sofía, Diana was dressed in a slim-fitted skirt that offered little flexibility. Yet, she executed the curtsy flawlessly — knees bending in perfect form, posture straight, and eyes respectful but self-assured. Prince Charles, standing beside her, looked on with open admiration.
It wasn’t just about protocol. It was Diana showing the world how to carry dignity in every movement.
Even members of the Japanese royal family, known for their highly formal traditions, were reportedly impressed by Diana's ability to merge Western elegance with universal respect.
Kate Middleton: A Modern-Day Masterclass
Years later, it would be Kate Middleton, the new Princess of Wales, who would continue that legacy. From her earliest public duties, Kate has embodied the art of the curtsy — measured, deep, and full of intention.
When she greeted Queen Elizabeth II, royal watchers often noted how Kate’s curtsy was both heartfelt and perfectly timed. Not mechanical, not exaggerated — but deeply respectful. Her form became so iconic that etiquette experts began using her as a reference point when discussing modern royal manners.
Kate doesn’t just perform the gesture. She owns it.
Camilla: A Gesture Gone Wrong
And then, there’s Camilla.
While officially Queen Consort now, Camilla’s curtsies have long attracted criticism from body language analysts and the public alike. Why? Because they lack the polish, poise, and inner confidence that the gesture demands.
Her movements are often awkward, with a noticeable stiffness. Her facial expressions — rather than reflecting grace or affection — tend to suggest discomfort or even reluctant submission. On several occasions, her curtsy resembled more of a clumsy knee bend than the fluid dip expected of a royal.
Rather than adding to the royal family’s image, critics argue that Camilla’s lack of elegance in the curtsy undermines the dignity of the institution she now represents. It may seem like a small thing, but in a world built on centuries of symbolism and protocol, small things matter deeply.
Why the Curtsy Still Matters
For the modern royal woman, gestures like the curtsy aren’t just old traditions — they’re living symbols. They show how one balances power with humility, confidence with reverence. And when done right, the message is clear: "I understand who I am and what I represent."
Diana mastered that balance. So does Kate.
Camilla, however, often appears unsure — as though she's still trying to fit into a role that was never fully hers to claim. That uncertainty shows, and it carries a subtle yet powerful effect.
Final Thoughts
The curtsy is more than a dip of the knees. It’s a quiet performance of character. Princess Diana did it with effortless nobility. Kate Middleton does it with warmth and precision. But when Camilla attempts it, the gesture feels strained — like a borrowed tradition rather than an instinctive one.
And in the court of public opinion, a single glance, a single movement, can echo louder than any crown.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps


Comments
Post a Comment